Educational Imbalance: The Other Side of the Coin

In the vast world occupied by thinkers and doers, education is the balancing scale.  Education permits students to work on their relative weakness, that is if they’re inclined to think, they’re taught to apply it and the same goes vice versa.

But balance can never persist without its twin pair, imbalance, or educational imbalance.  In fact, it’s a famous spot for transition, like:

• From not knowing what education is, to identifying and fully acknowledging it.

• From not being able to assimilate the impacts of education, to being equipped with such understanding.

• From a lack of access to education, to the newly established channels.

The list could go on and on; yet, it can never deter an observer from seeing how dramatic a change is if it started with educational imbalance.  Change, then is much more appreciated – citizens are cognisant to their various rights; no one needs to tread the blind side of ignorance, and a lot more.

Obviously, the word superimposes transition, and to that dramatic effect makes it look like a ‘revolution.’  At the heart of this transition is the dream for progress; and at play are stakeholders that stand a great chance of creating a huge leap not solely for them, but for their brothers and sisters.

Perhaps, it is why there ever exists in movies, antagonists – they make the protagonist’s existence worthwhile.  The same probably appeals to educational imbalance; without it, would it be easy to move forward?  Or much interestingly, would the need to move forward become evident?

More questions may chase the hunt for logic or rationale behind such concept.  The essence here is to present a belief that those anomalies, discrepancies, and other maladies exist for the purpose of pushing people to relentlessly inquire for remedies – something invaluable for a concept, or an argument.